Three smiling people against coloured backgrounds, as a visual element for employers.
Review stars icon

4,9/5 reviews

Increase productivity by better understanding how work actually flows

Productivity is not just about working harder or checking off more tasks. In organizations, productivity emerges especially when employees know what is important, have sufficient energy, collaborate well, and don’t get stuck in unclear processes.

With a productivity survey from Deepler, you make visible where work flows smoothly and where time, focus, or quality is lost. This way, you not only discover whether teams are productive, but especially which circumstances help or hinder productivity.

  • Discover where productivity in teams is hindered
  • Measure focus, collaboration, priorities, and work processes
  • Translate signals into targeted improvement actions
Screenshot of employee satisfaction survey results

Productivity: what does it mean and how can you increase it?

Many organizations want to increase productivity, but immediately start with solutions: new tools, stricter targets, or more efficient processes. That seems logical, but without a good understanding of the causes, it often remains symptom management.

Low productivity can result from work pressure, unclear priorities, poor handoffs, too many meetings, poor collaboration, or lack of ownership. A good productivity survey helps make those causes visible.

In this article we explain:

  • What productivity means within an organization
  • How to measure employee productivity
  • Which factors increase or decrease productivity
  • How to recognize low productivity in teams
  • How Deepler helps to improve productivity in a targeted way

Table of contents

What is productivity?

Productivity describes the relationship between what is invested and what it yields. In an organization, it’s not just about how many hours employees work, but especially about the value that emerges from those hours.

A team can be busy without actually being productive. Think of lots of meetings, many loose questions, lots of rework, or activities that overlap. Productivity becomes stronger when employees have clear goals, know what the priority is, and can do their work without unnecessary obstacles.

Measuring employee productivity without a control culture

Measuring productivity doesn’t have to mean controlling individual performance. In fact, it often backfires.

A good survey looks at the conditions under which employees do their work. Can they work focused? Is it clear what is expected?

Do processes connect smoothly? Is there enough room to deliver quality? This makes productivity a conversation about work improvement, not about mistrust.

Consequence of low employee satisfaction: employee sitting at a desk with their head on the keyboard, apparently dejected or exhausted.

Calculating labor productivity

Labor productivity is the ratio between what is produced and the labor needed to produce it:

  • Formula: labor productivity = output ÷ input
  • Output: for example revenue, the number of orders processed or products delivered
  • Input: for example hours worked or the number of FTEs
  • Example: in one week, a team handles 600 requests in 300 hours. Its productivity is then 2 requests per hour.

Note: the formula says nothing about quality, and works poorly for knowledge work, where output is hard to count.

Measuring productivity in knowledge work

In many roles, productivity can’t be captured in units or hours. So combine hard and soft indicators:

  • Results: goals achieved, lead time and quality of work
  • Working conditions: perceived focus, clarity of priorities and workload
  • Obstacles: time lost to meetings, interruptions, waiting and rework

It is the last two that show why a team is less productive than it could be, and they are best asked of employees themselves.

Why is productivity important?

Productivity largely determines how much momentum an organization has. When teams work productively, goals are achieved faster, frustration decreases, and there is more room for improvement.

But when productivity is low, it often feels like everyone is busy while little progress is being made. That’s not only inefficient, but also demoralizing. Employees become exhausted from work that costs a lot of energy but yields little.

Increasing productivity provides organizations with various benefits

Productivity is influenced by priorities, work processes, collaboration, focus, available resources, and the way time and energy are deployed. Precisely because productivity is often linked to multiple factors, it’s difficult to steer on output alone. A productivity survey makes visible where employees experience obstacles and which aspects of the work environment need attention.

1. More results from the same capacity

In a tight labor market, additional staff is not always the solution. By better understanding where time and energy are lost, you can get more value from the capacity you already have.

2. Less time lost due to unclear communication

When employees don’t know what the priority is, lots of switching, waiting, and re-coordinating occurs. A productivity survey shows where unclear communication slows down work and where better agreements are needed.

3. Better collaboration within and between teams

Productivity often depends on others. If handoffs are difficult or teams work at cross purposes, delays arise. By measuring collaboration in a targeted way, you see where coordination can be smarter.

4. Earlier detection of low productivity in teams

Low productivity in a team is not always visible in numbers. Sometimes you mainly see busyness, frustration, or declining quality. Research helps to recognize early where support is needed.

5. Better control over improving productivity

Improving productivity only works if you know which factors have influence. With clear insights, you can make targeted choices in processes, meetings, leadership, and task allocation.

Conduct your productivity survey with Deepler’s software

With Deepler, you investigate which factors influence productivity within teams. Employees easily provide feedback on focus, collaboration, work processes, priorities, work pressure, and support from managers.

The results are translated into clear dashboards, so HR, management, and leaders see where productivity is strengthened and where obstacles exist. This ensures the survey doesn’t get stuck in general conclusions, but creates a concrete picture of what each team needs.

Two people discussing work while looking at a tablet together.

Our satisfied customers

  • Logo Vereen
  • Logo-ABNAmro
  • Logo of "deSelectie" with the tagline "jouw recruitment marketing team" in bold, modern typography.
  • Logo of Van der Valk featuring a stylized toucan with a yellow beak and red accents.
  • Logo Securitas
  • Logo Brabant Water
  • Logo-eviden
  • Logo Smurfit Westrock
  • GestioNet logo with blue circular icons and the tagline "Play Think Learn".
  • Logo ABP
  • Logo-Gomes 1
  • Logo-uwv
  • Logo-headfirst
  • Logo Gemeente Velsen
  • Logo of Hendriks with a blue and orange icon and the Dutch slogan "Bedenkt, bouwt, beheert".
  • Truckland logo with blue and white text and an orange circle featuring horizontal white lines.
  • Logo-Site
  • Logo-Comtest
  • Logo of D&B The Facility Group in white text on a dark blue background with rounded squares.
  • Logo-Recruitment
  • Logo of Management Drives with bold "MD" initials and a colorful horizontal line beneath.
  • Logo-mateboer
  • Logo AM Groep
Dashboard view of the employee satisfaction survey system.

Causes of low productivity in teams

Low productivity is rarely down to effort. It usually lies in the conditions people work in. These are the causes that come up most often:

  • Unclear priorities: everything is important, so nothing gets real attention
  • Too many meetings: meetings without a clear purpose eat up focus time
  • Interruptions and distractions: notifications, ad hoc questions and switching between tasks
  • Workload and fatigue: structurally too much work drains energy and quality
  • Clunky processes and tools: duplicate work, manual steps and systems that don’t work together
  • Dependencies: waiting for information or approval from others
  • Little autonomy and recognition: employees can’t organize their own work or don’t feel seen

Which causes apply to you differs per team. That is why the best way to increase productivity is to start by asking where employees themselves lose time and energy.

Employee filling in the employee satisfaction survey.

A powerful tool for better organizational design

Productivity is not a separate HR topic. It touches strategy, leadership, processes, collaboration, and work pressure.

That’s precisely why it’s important to investigate it broadly. A team that seems unproductive might actually be suffering from unrealistic priorities, poor tooling, or structural understaffing.

With Deepler, you map that context. This way, you prevent productivity from being reduced to individual effort, when the real solution often lies in work design.

Three colleagues sitting together at a desk discussing the results of the employee satisfaction survey.

What are the benefits of a productivity survey?

A productivity survey gives direction to improvement. It shows where teams lose energy, where processes can be smarter, and where managers need to provide more clarity.

This makes increasing productivity not an abstract goal, but a concrete improvement process. The results help make choices: what do we tackle first, who owns it, and how do we measure whether work actually improves?

More targeted steering on focus and priority

Productivity quickly drops when everything is important at once. Employees become fragmented, teams mainly react to daily pressures, and strategic goals fade into the background.

A productivity survey shows whether employees know what the priority is and whether they have enough room to work on the right tasks. This makes it easier to bring focus back into the organization.

Colleagues working together on documents and laptops during a meeting.
Two colleagues writing and conferring together at a whiteboard in the office.

Work more efficiently without pushing harder

Many organizations try to increase productivity by increasing pressure. This can work temporarily, but often leads to exhaustion, resistance, or lower quality.

Deepler helps make visible which obstacles limit productivity. Think of unclear processes, too many meetings, poor handoffs, or dependencies between teams. By addressing those causes, you improve the way of working instead of just increasing pressure on people.

More ownership in teams

Teams become more productive when they understand the goal and can contribute ideas for improvement. A survey gives employees language to indicate where work gets stuck.

This increases ownership: not only managers see what can be better, but teams can contribute to solutions themselves. This creates productivity improvement that is not imposed from above, but carried by the practice itself.

Three young people sitting on a pavement working together with a laptop and a smartphone.

Increasing employee productivity: 8 tips

Increasing productivity in an organization is different from personal productivity hacks. It is about the conditions in which teams do their work. With these eight tips, you take the brakes off without pushing harder.

1. Map where time is lost

Ask employees where they get stuck: in meetings, waiting time, unclear assignments or systems. That way you tackle the real causes instead of the symptoms.

2. Make priorities clear

Translate organizational goals into a limited number of team priorities. When everyone knows what matters most right now, much of the switching and coordinating disappears.

3. Protect focus time

Agree on fixed blocks for concentrated work, such as a meeting-free morning. Make clear agreements about availability, so not every question needs an immediate answer.

4. Meet less, and better

Give every meeting a purpose, an agenda and a fixed duration. Drop recurring meetings that no longer add value, and replace status meetings with a short written update.

5. Simplify processes and tools

Look at where duplicate work, manual steps or separate systems cost time. Automate what you can, and make sure information is kept in one place that is easy to find.

6. Keep workload in balance

Structurally too much work lowers productivity over time, because energy and quality decline. Keep an eye on workload per team. Read more on our page about measuring and reducing workload.

7. Give autonomy and room for development

Employees who can decide how to organize their work, and who can grow in their profession, are more motivated. Invest in training and let teams help shape improvements.

8. Show appreciation and give feedback

Recognition and regular feedback keep people engaged. Make feedback part of the work, not just of the annual review. Also read how to improve performance management with real-time feedback.

Trusted by small and large organizations

Experiences of clients who make a difference with us.

  • Portrait of a smiling man in a suit in front of an orange background, titled "Review-image-Larren (1)."

    Larren

    Recruitment Lead, 

    De Selectie

    Review stars icon

    “Recently, I used Deepler to arrive at an EVP. Great what they were able to achieve in a short time! In a period of two weeks, we collected information and were able to continue with our AMC plan. In any other situation, it takes weeks, if not months, to get this done. Contact is good, friendly and constructive. Very nice club to work with.”

  • Portrait of a smiling man named Douwe with a bald head and light eyes, against a turquoise background.

    Douwe

    Recruiter, 

    Securitas

    Review stars icon

    “Ideal tool and company to gain more and better insight into the organization and employees as an organization! And especially with speed! For us, it was also the need to get tools for the topics of retention, to prevent future absenteeism or turnover. I also have experience with other parties and I sincerely value the speed of switching, follow-up and personal contact with Deepler. Absolutely recommended.”

  • Portrait of Jolanda with long blonde hair, wearing a black lace top, set against a purple background.

    Jolanda

    HR Business Partner, 

    Nedcargo

    Review stars icon

    “Deepler is a great tool for continuously collecting feedback from our employees. This input is then centrally available for us as management, but also for managers who benefit from it.”

  • Portrait of Jonathan in a blue suit and tie, smiling in front of a blue background.

    Jonathan

    Manager, 

    UWV

    Review stars icon

    “What makes Deepler special is that it doesn’t get stuck in numbers. It helps you immediately understand where it is and what teams need. For us, this ensured that employees themselves came up with areas for improvement and took responsibility for them. The insights were sharp and useful, but most importantly: the conversation that started afterwards made the difference. Thanks to Deepler, we didn’t get a paper plan, but change that was supported by the people themselves.”

  • Vector

    Amadeus

    COO, 

    OSRE

    Review stars icon

    “The software has a positive impact on us as a rapidly growing organization. By better understanding what is going on in the workplace and what people offer as solutions for improvements, we can make more effective decisions. The platform helps us to gain real-time insight and to respond directly to it via the tool.”

Man leaning forward at a desk, looking at a laptop with concentration.

Is a productivity survey mandatory?

A productivity survey is not legally required in the Netherlands. Yet it can strongly contribute to good employment practices and effective organizational policy.

Productivity touches on issues such as work pressure, work processes, leadership, and sustainable employability. When employees consistently get stuck or lose lots of energy to inefficient work, it can ultimately affect motivation, quality, and absenteeism. By carefully investigating productivity, you gain a better understanding of the conditions under which employees perform their work.

Is a productivity survey anonymous?

In a productivity survey, anonymity is important because employees might otherwise give socially desirable answers. Nobody wants to be seen as unproductive or create the impression that the team is not functioning well.

That’s why it’s wise to report results at group level and clearly communicate that the survey is about work factors, not individual performance evaluation. This creates more space for honest feedback about processes, priorities, and collaboration.

A motivated group of colleagues listening and applauding during a presentation in the office.
Man on a Zoom call while drinking coffee at his desk.

What about GDPR and privacy when measuring productivity?

When measuring productivity, you must handle personal data and traceable information carefully. Especially when feedback is combined with team, job role, or department data, it’s important that reports cannot be traced back to individual employees.

A good productivity survey works with clear objectives, minimal data collection, and reporting at an appropriate aggregation level. The goal is not to monitor individual output, but to make organizational patterns visible that affect productivity.

What is the role of HR, management, and leaders?

HR monitors survey quality, communication, and follow-up. Management determines why productivity is being surveyed and what strategic choices are connected to it.

Leaders play a crucial role in translating results to teams. They discuss the results, identify practical obstacles, and help refine priorities.

Employees provide input from daily practice. It’s precisely this combination of perspectives that makes it possible to not only measure productivity, but actually improve it.

Two colleagues working on laptops at a shared desk in a modern office with brick walls, seen from above.
Woman in a grey blazer working on a laptop at a meeting table with colleagues in the background.

Why do many organizations still conduct a productivity survey?

Many organizations notice that working harder doesn’t automatically lead to better results. There are meetings, coordination, reporting, and adjustments, but progress still lags behind.

A productivity survey helps break that pattern. It makes visible where work gets stuck, where energy is wasted, and which improvements have the most impact. This turns increasing productivity into a collective search for smarter work, not a demand to simply do more.

How to get more out of your productivity survey

Focus on work factors, not blame

Survey productivity from the question: what helps or hinders people from doing good work? This prevents the survey from feeling like an evaluation and increases the chances of honest answers.

Two smiling people in casual clothes posing against a blue background.

Connect productivity with quality

More output is not automatically better. So also ask about rework, errors, clarity, and handoffs. Productivity only becomes valuable when speed and quality improve together.

Two smiling colleagues in a meeting in the financial sector.

Make improvements small and actionable

Don’t immediately opt for a large efficiency program. Start with one or two concrete obstacles per team, such as meeting structure, prioritization, or task distribution. Small improvements often deliver quick visible results.

Smiling man in a red shirt with a colourful logo in the top left corner.

Do’s of a productivity survey

A good productivity survey requires a careful approach. The topic can be sensitive because employees quickly link productivity to evaluation. Make it clear that the survey is intended to better organize work.

  • Explain why productivity is being surveyed
  • Ask about concrete work obstacles and conditions
  • Combine results with team conversations
  • Report at group level and avoid individual evaluation
  • Translate insights into small, measurable improvement actions

Don’ts of a productivity survey

  • Don’t use the survey as performance control on individuals
  • Don’t measure only output without looking at quality
  • Don’t draw conclusions without understanding the work context
  • Don’t make productivity synonymous with working harder
  • Don’t collect data you don’t need for improvement
Two people discussing work while looking at a tablet together.

What do you do with the results of a productivity survey?

The results of a productivity survey only become valuable when they lead to better choices in work. A productivity score alone says little.

The real value lies in understanding the causes: where do people lose focus, which processes take unnecessarily long, where is clarity lacking, and which dependencies slow down work? By carefully following up on the results, you prevent productivity from remaining an abstract management topic.

Converting insights into action

Now that you understand where productivity is being held back, it’s time to implement targeted measures. This doesn’t always mean major changes: often it’s about purposeful improvements in processes, communication or work structure. You focus on the bottlenecks that have the most impact and that your team can address directly.

The key to success is not to see this as a one-time project, but as part of a continuous improvement cycle. By regularly feeding back results to teams, clearly defining agreements and monitoring progress, you build an organization where work runs more effectively and employees can reach their full potential. We have identified 6 follow-up steps for you that you can implement immediately:

Want to know how to recognize work stress earlier, before it affects productivity? Read our article:
From absence figures to early signals: spotting work stress sooner

Analyze where productivity is being slowed down

Don’t just look at average scores, but at differences between teams, functions, or processes. Look for patterns in focus, priorities, collaboration, and workload.

Not every bottleneck is equally important. Choose the causes that affect many employees or have direct impact on quality, speed, or customer value.

Use the outcomes as a starting point for a conversation. Ask employees which examples they recognize and which solutions they think are feasible in daily practice.

Translate insights into agreements, such as fewer meetings, clearer priorities, better handovers, or more defined role allocation. Make it clear for each action who is responsible.

Improving productivity doesn’t work if every bottleneck is addressed simultaneously. Start with the biggest energy drain or bottleneck and build from there.

Measure again over time whether employees experience more focus, clarity, and collaboration. This shows whether improvements actually have an impact on work practice.

Three dashboard cards with percentages for trust in managers, training and team dynamics.

Make productivity discussable with insight into daily work

With Deepler, managers and HR see where productivity is supported or hindered. Dashboards show which topics require attention per team, such as priorities, collaboration, workload, or processes. This creates a concrete conversation about working smarter, without it being about individual monitoring.

Organizational research without high costs

Choose the Basic or Plus package to match your needs. Want to compare multiple countries or organizations? Then the Enterprise package is the best choice.

Basic

From

€2.49

Per employee per month, per suite

Get started quickly with insight into your organization.

View all features →Request a demo
Most popular

Plus

From

€3.49

Per employee per month, per suite

Reach multiple teams and follow up actively.

View all features →Request a demo

Enterprise

Price

Custom

Proposal tailored to your organization

For organizations from 500 employees, with customization.

View all features →Request a demo

750 employees or more? Then a tailored tiered price applies. Contact sales →

Combine suites and save: 2nd suite 50% off, 3rd suite 75% off, 4th suite free. Calculate your bundle price →

Prices shown assume annual billing.

Frequently asked questions

What is productivity?

Productivity is the ratio between input and output. Within organizations, it’s not just about how much work employees do, but especially about how much value that work delivers. Good productivity means that people can spend their time and energy on work that contributes to clear goals.

Workplace productivity is about how smoothly work is executed. Think of focus, collaboration, clear priorities, good processes and adequate support. When these factors are missing, employees can be very busy while actual progress remains low.

Increasing productivity starts with understanding where productivity is being slowed down. Investigate where time is lost, which processes are sluggish, where priorities are unclear and which teams have a lot of rework. Then you can make targeted improvements in consultation, task distribution, decision-making or support.

Productivity is often calculated by dividing output by input. In organizations, this is more difficult, because not all value is easy to capture in numbers. Therefore, it is wise to combine quantitative data with feedback on quality, collaboration, focus and work processes.

An employer may measure productivity, but must do so carefully regarding privacy, proportionality and purpose. Only measure what is necessary, be transparent about the purpose and prevent employees from being unnecessarily monitored individually. In organizational research, the emphasis is on improving work factors.

You improve employee productivity by strengthening the conditions for good work. Ensure clear goals, achievable priorities, good collaboration, appropriate support and processes that don’t unnecessarily slow things down. A survey helps determine which conditions need the most attention.

Low productivity can arise from unclear priorities, too much ad-hoc work, poor handovers, unnecessary meetings, poor collaboration, high workload or insufficient leadership. Often it is not one cause, but a combination of factors that reinforce each other.

Workload is about the experienced burden of work. Productivity is about what the work delivers in relation to the effort. They are related: high workload can reduce productivity, but low productivity can also cause additional workload because tasks pile up.

Good questions focus on influenceable work factors. Examples are: I know which priorities are important; I can work sufficiently focused; Meetings contribute to my work; Handovers between teams run smoothly; I have the tools to do my work well.

That depends on the situation. With major changes, growth or low team results, more frequent measurement is useful.

In stable periods, productivity can be part of a broader periodic employee survey. What’s important is that you follow up on results before measuring again.

Honest answers emerge when employees understand that the survey is not intended as individual performance measurement. Communicate clearly that it is about work factors, report at group level and show what improvement actions follow. Trust is essential on this topic.

Make it clear from the start that the research is about circumstances that enable productivity, not about individual accountability. Ask questions about focus, collaboration, processes, priorities, and obstacles. Share results at group level and visibly provide feedback on which improvements are being implemented.

Leadership has a significant impact on productivity. Managers partly determine how clear goals are, how decisions are made, how much space employees get, and how well obstacles are removed. Strong leadership helps teams maintain focus and direct their energy toward work that truly contributes.

Labor productivity is the ratio between employees’ output and the labor needed to achieve it, for example revenue or orders processed per hour worked or per FTE. It is a useful measure for production work, but says little about quality and knowledge work.

Productivity is about how much value you deliver with the time and people available. Efficiency is about how little time or resources you waste doing so. A team can work efficiently on the wrong work; real productivity also requires the right priorities.

In knowledge work, you combine results, such as goals achieved, lead time and quality, with employees’ experience: how much focus time they have, how clear priorities are and where time is lost to meetings or waiting.

Often, yes. Meetings without a clear purpose cost focus time and interrupt concentrated work. By giving meetings a purpose, an agenda and a fixed duration, and sharing status updates in writing, teams have more time left for the work itself.

Schedule a consultation

Ready to take the next step? Get in touch and together we will look at the best approach. Whether you have a question or just want to brainstorm, we are here for you.

  • A look at the Deepler dashboard
  • Personal advice and a start with honest insight
  • A no-obligation conversation for all your questions
Person in a yellow jumper holding a smartphone with the Deepler app and colourful data visualisation on the screen.
E-learning card added by Leon with a score of 36 and plus and minus buttons.
Card titled "Onboarding colleagues" showing a 14-day streak and 10 of 12 tasks completed.
Background-circles-Deepler