AI for better performance management: case studies from practice
AI for better performance management: case studies from practice Performance management is under pre...
Verder lezen
Table of contents
Annual performance reviews are disappearing. Not because feedback is becoming less important, but precisely because organizations realize that one or two conversations per year are no longer sufficient. In a time when markets change rapidly and teams need to be agile, everyone needs faster course correction and more room for development. Continuous feedback is not just another HR trend. It’s a fundamental shift in how we view performance improvement. Instead of retrospectively assessing what went wrong, you create an environment where people can continuously learn and grow. This does require a different approach, where feedback is no longer something you receive during a formal conversation, but becomes a natural part of daily collaboration.
What is a feedback culture, really? A feedback culture is a work environment where people help each other improve in a constructive way. it’s about more than just managers giving their employees feedback. in a true feedback culture, colleagues give each other feedback, employees actively ask for input, and leaders dare to be vulnerable by receiving feedback themselves. the difference from traditional performance management is that feedback is no longer tied to assessment moments. an employee doesn’t have to wait months for a performance review to hear how things are going. instead, someone hears immediately after a presentation what went well and where there’s room for improvement. or a team leader asks after a tough meeting how team members experienced their approach. this form of continuous feedback ensures that people can course-correct faster. A salesperson who receives brief feedback after each client conversation can adjust their approach immediately. A developer who receives constructive input during a code review learns faster than when evaluation only happens after three months.
The power of continuous feedback lies in the timing. When feedback directly follows an action or performance, it’s more relevant and sticks better. Think of an employee who has resolved a complex customer complaint. If you discuss that same day what went well and what could be different next time, that has much more impact than when you bring this up three months later during an evaluation conversation. Additionally, regular feedback creates more engagement. Employees who structurally receive input on their work feel seen and heard. They know where they stand and what’s expected of them. That provides direction and motivation, two essential ingredients for good performance. Continuous feedback also makes managers’ work easier. Instead of one large evaluation conversation where you have to summarize twelve months, you conduct ongoing short conversations about concrete situations. That feels more natural and leads to less resistance. Nobody likes surprises during a performance review, and with continuous feedback, those no longer exist. For the organization as a whole, a feedback culture means faster adaptation to changes. Teams that are accustomed to providing each other with input can switch faster when priorities change or new challenges arise. That agility is invaluable in current times.
Continuous feedback stands or falls with psychological safety. If people are afraid of negative consequences, they’ll avoid or hide feedback. Then you get superficial conversations where nobody really dares to say what needs to be said. Psychological safety means that employees feel safe to make mistakes, ask questions, and be vulnerable. In such an environment, feedback is seen as an opportunity to learn, not as criticism that will be used against you. That starts with leaders who set the example by actively asking for feedback and showing that they actually do something with it. A manager who asks during a team meeting how team members experience their communication style, and then genuinely listens without becoming defensive, creates safety. When that same manager shows a week later that they’ve adjusted their approach based on that feedback, you reinforce the signal that feedback is welcome and has an effect. How you deal with mistakes also plays a major role. In organizations where mistakes are seen as learning moments instead of failure, people dare to admit sooner that something didn’t go well. That opens the door for constructive conversations about what could be better, without anyone feeling attacked.
Not all feedback is equally valuable. There’s a difference between “you did that well” and feedback that truly helps someone improve. Effective feedback is specific, timely, and focused on behavior rather than on the person. Specific feedback is about concrete situations and observations. Instead of saying “your presentations could be better,” you say “during your presentation yesterday, I noticed you made little eye contact with the audience, which made the connection less strong. If you do that more next time, your message will come across better.” That gives someone a clear starting point to work with. Timing is crucial. Feedback has the most impact when given shortly after the event, while everything is still fresh in memory. Don’t wait weeks, but find a moment within a few days to have the conversation. This doesn’t always have to be extensive; sometimes a brief five-minute conversation suffices. Focus on behavior and impact, not on intentions or personality. Don’t say “you’re chaotic,” but “when you jump from one topic to another during meetings, people lose the thread and don’t feel heard.” That makes feedback less personal and easier to accept. Good feedback is also a two-way conversation. Ask questions, listen to the context, and try to reach insights together. Someone who gets to think for themselves about what could be different accepts the feedback better than when you only tell them what needs to change.
A feedback culture doesn’t arise spontaneously. It requires conscious choices and a structural approach. Start by embedding feedback moments in existing processes. Think of brief check-ins after projects, weekly one-on-one conversations between managers and employees, or peer feedback sessions within teams. Many organizations work with short weekly or biweekly conversations between supervisor and employee. These conversations don’t need to be long; twenty minutes is often enough. It’s about regular contact where you discuss what’s going well, what someone is struggling with, and what’s needed to move forward. By standardizing these conversations, you make feedback a natural part of the work week. Peer feedback also deserves a structural place. Teams can, for example, do a brief retrospective after each sprint where they give each other feedback on collaboration. Or you introduce a buddy system where colleagues help each other improve in specific skills. Technology can help make feedback accessible. Platforms that support continuous feedback make it easy to quickly give a compliment, share a development point, or ask for input. That removes barriers and ensures that feedback becomes a natural part of the workday. Tools like Deepler can support this by regularly collecting employee feedback and making visible where teams and individuals stand.
Giving feedback is a skill you can learn. Not everyone is naturally good at conducting constructive conversations. That’s why training is essential when you want to build a feedback culture. Start with your leaders. They set the example and have the greatest influence on how teams deal with feedback. Train them in conducting effective feedback conversations, creating psychological safety, and dealing with resistance. Give them concrete tools and frameworks they can use, such as the SBI method (Situation, Behavior, Impact) or the GROW model for coaching conversations. But don’t limit training to managers. In a true feedback culture, everyone gives feedback, so also invest in developing your employees. Teach them how to give constructive feedback to colleagues and how to receive feedback without becoming defensive. The latter is at least as important as giving itself. Also make feedback part of team development. Discuss with teams how they want to interact with each other, what agreements they make about feedback, and how they want to address each other. When teams take ownership of their feedback culture themselves, it becomes much more natural than when it’s imposed from above.
Continuous feedback is most valuable when directly linked to personal development. Feedback shouldn’t only be about what could be better, but should also lead to concrete actions and growth. Create development plans that build on the feedback someone receives. If multiple conversations show that an employee struggles with prioritizing, then look together at training, coaching, or other interventions that can help. This way, feedback doesn’t become an end in itself, but a means to truly help people progress. Celebrating progress also belongs to a good feedback culture. When someone makes clear steps based on earlier feedback, explicitly acknowledge that. That reinforces the positive effect and motivates continued development. Ensure that feedback isn’t only about what needs improvement, but also about what someone does well and where their strengths lie. People grow most when they can further develop their talents. Feedback that only focuses on weaknesses eventually demotivates.
When building a feedback culture, organizations encounter several common pitfalls. The first is that feedback remains too superficial. People only give compliments or general comments without real depth. That feels safe, but doesn’t help anyone progress. Break through this by being specific and giving concrete examples. Another pitfall is that feedback remains one-way traffic. Managers give feedback to employees, but it doesn’t happen the other way around. Or senior colleagues give input to juniors, but not vice versa. A true feedback culture is multidirectional. Therefore, actively encourage everyone to give and receive feedback, regardless of their position. Some organizations make the mistake of introducing continuous feedback without adjusting assessment systems. If employees know that at the end of the year there will still be a rating that determines their salary, feedback remains colored by that threat. Therefore, decouple your reward systems from individual assessments, or ensure that continuous feedback becomes an integral part of how you evaluate performance. Finally, there’s the risk of feedback fatigue. If you overwhelm people with feedback without there being room to work with it, it becomes counterproductive. So keep it manageable. Better three concrete points per month that someone can really work with than a weekly laundry list of improvement points.
A feedback culture becomes stronger when you combine it with data-driven insights. Platforms like Deepler help organizations not only collect qualitative feedback, but also recognize patterns and see trends. By regularly conducting short employee surveys, you gain insight into how employees experience the feedback culture. Do people feel safe enough to give feedback? Do they receive sufficient input on their work? Do they see their development? These insights help you make targeted adjustments and invest where needed. Data also makes visible whether feedback actually leads to performance improvement. You can, for example, measure whether teams that give and receive more feedback also perform better on productivity, engagement, or retention. That helps substantiate the importance of feedback and create support within the organization. Don’t use data to control people, but to support them. When you see that a team exchanges little feedback, that’s a signal to investigate what’s happening. Perhaps there’s insufficient psychological safety, or time and structure are lacking. With those insights, you can implement targeted interventions.
Implementation: where do you start? establishing a feedback culture is not a project you complete in a month. it’s a change process that requires time, attention, and perseverance. start small and build gradually. start with a pilot team or department where you experiment with continuous feedback. choose a team that’s open to change and where management is willing to truly invest. learn from what works and what doesn’t, and use those lessons to roll out the approach more broadly. ensure visible commitment from management. when the executive team actively gives and receives feedback themselves, and is transparent about it, that sets the tone for the rest of the organization. have them share how feedback has helped them improve, and celebrate successes that result from a good feedback culture. invest in training and guidance, but also in the right tools and processes. make it easy for people to give and receive feedback. build it into your work processes, so it doesn’t become an extra burden but a natural part of how you collaborate. measure progress and keep adjusting. A feedback culture is never finished; it requires continuous attention and adaptation. use data to see if you’re on the right track, and keep talking with your people about how they experience the culture and what could be better.
A strong feedback culture is one of the most powerful levers for performance improvement. It ensures that people learn faster, teams become more agile, and organizations can better anticipate change. But it does require a fundamental shift in how you view performance management. Instead of retrospectively assessing, you invest in development upfront. Instead of control, you choose trust. And instead of annual rituals, you make feedback a natural part of daily collaboration. The organizations that succeed in this see it reflected in better results, higher engagement, and less turnover. They create an environment where people bring out the best in themselves, not because they have to, but because they receive the space and support to grow. Start today with small steps. Conduct an extra feedback conversation with a team member this week. Ask your colleagues how they experience your approach. Or start a pilot with continuous feedback within one team. Each step brings you closer to a culture where feedback is no longer something to dread, but a natural part of how you improve together.
About the author
Leon Salm
Leon is a passionate writer and the founder of Deepler. With a keen eye for the system and a passion for the software, he helps his clients, partners, and organizations move forward.
Share:
Schedule a consultation
Ready to take action? We’ll work together to find the best approach.
Experiences of customers who make a difference with us.